Maybe I am a formalist, but I think it is better for the WG proposal to follow exactly the structure and the numbering scheme layed out in the OpenID Process document Article 4.1 so that we will get a consitent format for every WGs. <br>
<br>One of the failing reason for the spec concil not issuing recommendation is exactly this. (Article 4.2 (a)). <br>SInce it is just a formatting issue, it is better to do it. <br><br>=nat<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Mike Jones <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Michael.Jones@microsoft.com">Michael.Jones@microsoft.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
+1 from me as well.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: <a href="mailto:specs-council-bounces@openid.net">specs-council-bounces@openid.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:specs-council-bounces@openid.net">specs-council-bounces@openid.net</a>] On Behalf Of Josh Hoyt<br>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 1:54 PM<br>
To: <a href="mailto:specs-council@openid.net">specs-council@openid.net</a><br>
Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Fwd: FW: Proposal to create the OpenID OAuth Hybrid Working Group<br>
<br>
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:29 PM, David Recordon <<a href="mailto:recordond@gmail.com">recordond@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> I am +1 for approving this proposal.<br>
<br>
Also +1 from me.<br>
<br>
j3h<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Nat Sakimura (=nat)<br><a href="http://www.sakimura.org/en/">http://www.sakimura.org/en/</a><br>