Comments on: Yahoo!, PayPal, Google, Equifax, AOL, VeriSign, Acxiom, Citi, Privo, Wave Systems Pilot Open Identity for Open Government http://openid.net/2009/09/09/yahoo-paypal-google-equifax-aol-verisign-acxiom-citi-privo-wave-systems-pilot-open-identity-for-open-government-2/ Home of the OpenID community Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:11:14 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Cutting back on your long list of passwords | SEO MetaBlog http://openid.net/2009/09/09/yahoo-paypal-google-equifax-aol-verisign-acxiom-citi-privo-wave-systems-pilot-open-identity-for-open-government-2/#comment-74657 Cutting back on your long list of passwords | SEO MetaBlog Wed, 04 Nov 2009 07:00:33 +0000 http://openid.net/?p=1413#comment-74657 [...] of the security and privacy of these technologies, the same techniques are being piloted by President Obama’s open identity initiative to enable citizens to sign in more easily to government-operated [...] [...] of the security and privacy of these technologies, the same techniques are being piloted by President Obama’s open identity initiative to enable citizens to sign in more easily to government-operated [...]

]]> By: [Google Code] Un nouveau coup porté à votre énorme liste de mots de passe http://openid.net/2009/09/09/yahoo-paypal-google-equifax-aol-verisign-acxiom-citi-privo-wave-systems-pilot-open-identity-for-open-government-2/#comment-74649 [Google Code] Un nouveau coup porté à votre énorme liste de mots de passe Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:47:06 +0000 http://openid.net/?p=1413#comment-74649 [...] de la confidentialité de ces technologies, ces mêmes techniques vont être mises en place par la Maison Blanche pour permettre aux citoyens américains de se connecter plus facilement aux sites [...] [...] de la confidentialité de ces technologies, ces mêmes techniques vont être mises en place par la Maison Blanche pour permettre aux citoyens américains de se connecter plus facilement aux sites [...]

]]> By: andhyz.com http://openid.net/2009/09/09/yahoo-paypal-google-equifax-aol-verisign-acxiom-citi-privo-wave-systems-pilot-open-identity-for-open-government-2/#comment-74595 andhyz.com Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:14:31 +0000 http://openid.net/?p=1413#comment-74595 Off topic: OpenID.net weblog doesn’t use OpenID for comments? Another off topic, for the love of god, shorten the URI of this post! Off topic: OpenID.net weblog doesn’t use OpenID for comments? Another off topic, for the love of god, shorten the URI of this post!

]]> By: David Collantes http://openid.net/2009/09/09/yahoo-paypal-google-equifax-aol-verisign-acxiom-citi-privo-wave-systems-pilot-open-identity-for-open-government-2/#comment-74103 David Collantes Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:27:09 +0000 http://openid.net/?p=1413#comment-74103 Off topic: OpenID.net weblog doesn't use OpenID for comments? Another off topic, for the love of god, shorten the URI of this post! Nothing to say on topic. Off topic: OpenID.net weblog doesn’t use OpenID for comments? Another off topic, for the love of god, shorten the URI of this post!

Nothing to say on topic.

]]> By: Seth http://openid.net/2009/09/09/yahoo-paypal-google-equifax-aol-verisign-acxiom-citi-privo-wave-systems-pilot-open-identity-for-open-government-2/#comment-74053 Seth Wed, 09 Sep 2009 21:43:54 +0000 http://openid.net/?p=1413#comment-74053 This is a terrible idea. The stated goals can be reached by many other means, and this open ID program is a small step, but isn't designed to encourage a "citizen's government". the design of such things are useful only in subjugating people. From this small step in this direction, a dozen turns can be made, and all of them look bad to me. It is not necessary for privacy reasons, or any of the reasons stated, and therefore is very suspect. The list of big players that are working on it is even more suspect. The timing to go along with several other identity system implementations creating nationwide databases is most suspect. This is a terrible idea. The stated goals can be reached by many other means, and this open ID program is a small step, but isn’t designed to encourage a “citizen’s government”. the design of such things are useful only in subjugating people. From this small step in this direction, a dozen turns can be made, and all of them look bad to me. It is not necessary for privacy reasons, or any of the reasons stated, and therefore is very suspect. The list of big players that are working on it is even more suspect. The timing to go along with several other identity system implementations creating nationwide databases is most suspect.

]]>