<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A new chapter in the OIDF</title>
	<atom:link href="http://openid.net/2008/05/28/a-new-chapter-in-the-oidf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://openid.net/2008/05/28/a-new-chapter-in-the-oidf/</link>
	<description>Home of the OpenID community</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vanessa</title>
		<link>http://openid.net/2008/05/28/a-new-chapter-in-the-oidf/#comment-21035</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openid.net/?p=68#comment-21035</guid>
		<description>Hi.could you just tell me how to get the id.Im a kid and need more help with this stuff. now i cant get on my yahoo and I NEED MY YAHOO!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.could you just tell me how to get the id.Im a kid and need more help with this stuff. now i cant get on my yahoo and I NEED MY YAHOO!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Cancro</title>
		<link>http://openid.net/2008/05/28/a-new-chapter-in-the-oidf/#comment-21022</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Cancro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openid.net/?p=68#comment-21022</guid>
		<description>I'm a little disappointed with the direction taken by OpenID following the inception of the OpenID Foundation.  OpenID 1.1 was elegant simplicity, easy to implement and very straightforward.  OpenID 2.0 reeks of "design by committee."  It looks as if the technologies being developed by all of the foundation members were simply mashed together without removing any unnecessary cruft, and now the spec has a jumble of extra features and requirements that make it unnecessarily complex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little disappointed with the direction taken by OpenID following the inception of the OpenID Foundation.  OpenID 1.1 was elegant simplicity, easy to implement and very straightforward.  OpenID 2.0 reeks of &#8220;design by committee.&#8221;  It looks as if the technologies being developed by all of the foundation members were simply mashed together without removing any unnecessary cruft, and now the spec has a jumble of extra features and requirements that make it unnecessarily complex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arkilite</title>
		<link>http://openid.net/2008/05/28/a-new-chapter-in-the-oidf/#comment-20932</link>
		<dc:creator>Arkilite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 19:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openid.net/?p=68#comment-20932</guid>
		<description>I think OpenID is very useful now! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think OpenID is very useful now! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://openid.net/2008/05/28/a-new-chapter-in-the-oidf/#comment-20905</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 00:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openid.net/?p=68#comment-20905</guid>
		<description>I'm waiting for the day when WordPress blogs use OpenID. Just created site number 140'ish and once again there's another user pass to remember.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m waiting for the day when WordPress blogs use OpenID. Just created site number 140&#8242;ish and once again there&#8217;s another user pass to remember.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jefflin</title>
		<link>http://openid.net/2008/05/28/a-new-chapter-in-the-oidf/#comment-20157</link>
		<dc:creator>jefflin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openid.net/?p=68#comment-20157</guid>
		<description>I agreed with mitoman,  it's reported that the pediawiki and many other sns sites will support the open id.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agreed with mitoman,  it&#8217;s reported that the pediawiki and many other sns sites will support the open id.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitoman</title>
		<link>http://openid.net/2008/05/28/a-new-chapter-in-the-oidf/#comment-20129</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openid.net/?p=68#comment-20129</guid>
		<description>thanks a lot, I guess open ID will be a lot useful in the future</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks a lot, I guess open ID will be a lot useful in the future</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noclegi</title>
		<link>http://openid.net/2008/05/28/a-new-chapter-in-the-oidf/#comment-19895</link>
		<dc:creator>Noclegi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 14:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openid.net/?p=68#comment-19895</guid>
		<description>The fact that the foundation is going to the consecutive stage means that it is developing. It is very nice that it is going this way. You are needed. Congratulations</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that the foundation is going to the consecutive stage means that it is developing. It is very nice that it is going this way. You are needed. Congratulations</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenID is looking for a new Executive Director : Broerse Blog</title>
		<link>http://openid.net/2008/05/28/a-new-chapter-in-the-oidf/#comment-19743</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenID is looking for a new Executive Director : Broerse Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 20:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openid.net/?p=68#comment-19743</guid>
		<description>[...] This seems more like fired for not pushing OpenID hard enough. The job is still vacant. It is a pity I am already the Executive Director of OpenSignOn [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This seems more like fired for not pushing OpenID hard enough. The job is still vacant. It is a pity I am already the Executive Director of OpenSignOn [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
