<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evolving the OpenID Foundation Board</title>
	<atom:link href="http://openid.net/2008/02/07/evolving-the-openid-foundation-board/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://openid.net/2008/02/07/evolving-the-openid-foundation-board/</link>
	<description>Home of the OpenID community</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: vijay</title>
		<link>http://openid.net/2008/02/07/evolving-the-openid-foundation-board/#comment-16010</link>
		<dc:creator>vijay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 04:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openid.net/2008/02/07/evolving-the-openid-foundation-board/#comment-16010</guid>
		<description>I have removed openid integration from my website temporarly because yahoo is reports CAUTION saying THIS SITE IS NOT VERIFIED. I just does not want to fill fears to my first time visiters at retailspice.com. Can anyone tell me how to avoid this caution notice from YAHOO when user try to login to my website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have removed openid integration from my website temporarly because yahoo is reports CAUTION saying THIS SITE IS NOT VERIFIED. I just does not want to fill fears to my first time visiters at retailspice.com. Can anyone tell me how to avoid this caution notice from YAHOO when user try to login to my website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Making sense of identity management statistics &#171; Random Oracle</title>
		<link>http://openid.net/2008/02/07/evolving-the-openid-foundation-board/#comment-7949</link>
		<dc:creator>Making sense of identity management statistics &#171; Random Oracle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 05:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openid.net/2008/02/07/evolving-the-openid-foundation-board/#comment-7949</guid>
		<description>[...] there a quarter billion OpenIDs? That would be the conclusion suggested by an announcement from OpenID website two months ago. How many of those users have actually used the OpenID protocol [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there a quarter billion OpenIDs? That would be the conclusion suggested by an announcement from OpenID website two months ago. How many of those users have actually used the OpenID protocol [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrik Biering » Identity management on the move</title>
		<link>http://openid.net/2008/02/07/evolving-the-openid-foundation-board/#comment-2986</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Biering » Identity management on the move</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 21:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openid.net/2008/02/07/evolving-the-openid-foundation-board/#comment-2986</guid>
		<description>[...] February Google, IBM, Microsoft, Yahoo and Verisign all demonstrated their support of OpenID by joining the board of the OpenID Foundation. In Europe and Japan there are also strong efforts to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] February Google, IBM, Microsoft, Yahoo and Verisign all demonstrated their support of OpenID by joining the board of the OpenID Foundation. In Europe and Japan there are also strong efforts to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A first introduction to OpenID &#171; YC&#8217;s ramblings</title>
		<link>http://openid.net/2008/02/07/evolving-the-openid-foundation-board/#comment-933</link>
		<dc:creator>A first introduction to OpenID &#171; YC&#8217;s ramblings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openid.net/2008/02/07/evolving-the-openid-foundation-board/#comment-933</guid>
		<description>[...] is my completely non-technical explanation of OpenID. I felt after all the OpenID buzz last week there was a need for such, seeing that even the BBC wrote a story that focuses on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is my completely non-technical explanation of OpenID. I felt after all the OpenID buzz last week there was a need for such, seeing that even the BBC wrote a story that focuses on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Developer&#8217;s Kanundrum &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Open Id already getting tainted?</title>
		<link>http://openid.net/2008/02/07/evolving-the-openid-foundation-board/#comment-859</link>
		<dc:creator>Developer&#8217;s Kanundrum &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Open Id already getting tainted?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openid.net/2008/02/07/evolving-the-openid-foundation-board/#comment-859</guid>
		<description>[...] and really didn&#8217;t enhance my login experience. With the recent announcement of more big names joining the party, I hope they don&#8217;t mangle what I thought was a really good [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and really didn&#8217;t enhance my login experience. With the recent announcement of more big names joining the party, I hope they don&#8217;t mangle what I thought was a really good [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylvain Maret</title>
		<link>http://openid.net/2008/02/07/evolving-the-openid-foundation-board/#comment-805</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvain Maret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 12:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openid.net/2008/02/07/evolving-the-openid-foundation-board/#comment-805</guid>
		<description>That a really good news. I hope this trend will push also strong authentication for every body.

We will see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That a really good news. I hope this trend will push also strong authentication for every body.</p>
<p>We will see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://openid.net/2008/02/07/evolving-the-openid-foundation-board/#comment-800</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 05:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openid.net/2008/02/07/evolving-the-openid-foundation-board/#comment-800</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I don't see any value in OpenID (yet). I see lots of potential, but that is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I don&#8217;t see any value in OpenID (yet). I see lots of potential, but that is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hemant Kulkarni</title>
		<link>http://openid.net/2008/02/07/evolving-the-openid-foundation-board/#comment-798</link>
		<dc:creator>Hemant Kulkarni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 04:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openid.net/2008/02/07/evolving-the-openid-foundation-board/#comment-798</guid>
		<description>I agree with earlier comment. It is important that all these companies who want to become OpenID providers also ACCEPT the OpenID. Unless this happens there is no real benefit to the end user. Companies focused around providing OpenID as a service then can distinguish themselves by providing specific services around identity managment like enhanced security (for example secure cards).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with earlier comment. It is important that all these companies who want to become OpenID providers also ACCEPT the OpenID. Unless this happens there is no real benefit to the end user. Companies focused around providing OpenID as a service then can distinguish themselves by providing specific services around identity managment like enhanced security (for example secure cards).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Kveton &#183; SG FooCamp &#8216;08: Where do we go from here?</title>
		<link>http://openid.net/2008/02/07/evolving-the-openid-foundation-board/#comment-794</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Kveton &#183; SG FooCamp &#8216;08: Where do we go from here?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 02:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openid.net/2008/02/07/evolving-the-openid-foundation-board/#comment-794</guid>
		<description>[...] (more on that below), on Tuesday I got a new job and then yesterday we made the long-awaited announcement around Google, IBM, Microsoft, VeriSign and Yahoo! joining the OpenID Foundation board. Add to that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (more on that below), on Tuesday I got a new job and then yesterday we made the long-awaited announcement around Google, IBM, Microsoft, VeriSign and Yahoo! joining the OpenID Foundation board. Add to that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vasco Névoa</title>
		<link>http://openid.net/2008/02/07/evolving-the-openid-foundation-board/#comment-755</link>
		<dc:creator>Vasco Névoa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 12:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openid.net/2008/02/07/evolving-the-openid-foundation-board/#comment-755</guid>
		<description>I see a big problem these days: there is a "provider race" going on. All these companies want to become the defacto identity provider, but none of them seems to want to accept other providers' OpenIDs.
This sucks. Maybe the foundation should make it clear to the participants (and everyone else) that OpenId will only fly if all websites ACCEPT openID authentication, and that becoming a provider is not critical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see a big problem these days: there is a &#8220;provider race&#8221; going on. All these companies want to become the defacto identity provider, but none of them seems to want to accept other providers&#8217; OpenIDs.<br />
This sucks. Maybe the foundation should make it clear to the participants (and everyone else) that OpenId will only fly if all websites ACCEPT openID authentication, and that becoming a provider is not critical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
