<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenID Intellectual Property Policy Approved</title>
	<atom:link href="http://openid.net/2007/12/31/openid-intellectual-property-policy-approved/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://openid.net/2007/12/31/openid-intellectual-property-policy-approved/</link>
	<description>Home of the OpenID community</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 01:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: OpenID &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thanks TechCrunch for supporting us!</title>
		<link>http://openid.net/2007/12/31/openid-intellectual-property-policy-approved/#comment-12343</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenID &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thanks TechCrunch for supporting us!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 03:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openid.net/2008/01/01/openid-intellectual-property-policy-approved/#comment-12343</guid>
		<description>[...] over the past year the Foundation has helped to establish an intellectual property policy to ensure that all OpenID specifications remain free to implement, got OpenID 2.0 out the door, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] over the past year the Foundation has helped to establish an intellectual property policy to ensure that all OpenID specifications remain free to implement, got OpenID 2.0 out the door, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Atkins</title>
		<link>http://openid.net/2007/12/31/openid-intellectual-property-policy-approved/#comment-391</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Atkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openid.net/2008/01/01/openid-intellectual-property-policy-approved/#comment-391</guid>
		<description>Hans,

As we currently stand, the general@ and other current OpenID lists remain open to all. Where the IPR policy talks about requiring a participation agreement before being able to join discussions, it is referring to the mailing lists that will exist for each ratified working group. Once this is underway, working groups will be discouraged from using contributions posted outside of their own mailing list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hans,</p>
<p>As we currently stand, the general@ and other current OpenID lists remain open to all. Where the IPR policy talks about requiring a participation agreement before being able to join discussions, it is referring to the mailing lists that will exist for each ratified working group. Once this is underway, working groups will be discouraged from using contributions posted outside of their own mailing list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans Granqvist</title>
		<link>http://openid.net/2007/12/31/openid-intellectual-property-policy-approved/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Granqvist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 09:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openid.net/2008/01/01/openid-intellectual-property-policy-approved/#comment-317</guid>
		<description>This is slightly confusing: can I still be on the @openid.net lists without signing anything? Will anything said on the lists be assumed to be covered by the IPR policy? Maybe I confuse the lists with upcoming, proper, WGs?

The rationale document linked from &lt;a href="http://openid.net/foundation/intellectual-property/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://openid.net/foundation/intellectual-property/&lt;/a&gt; seems to have disappeared. Is it correct to assume &lt;a href="http://openid.net/ipr/archive/OpenID_IPR_Rationale-Circulation_Draft_20070925.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;Draft_20070925.pdf&lt;/a&gt; is still the latest and that it will be updated?

I'd really like to figure out why W3C, IETF, OASIS, etc. IPR policies and processes were not considered usable. Perhaps a rationale FAQ entry could describe the reasoning and what diffs there are to these other standard orgs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is slightly confusing: can I still be on the @openid.net lists without signing anything? Will anything said on the lists be assumed to be covered by the IPR policy? Maybe I confuse the lists with upcoming, proper, WGs?</p>
<p>The rationale document linked from <a href="http://openid.net/foundation/intellectual-property/" rel="nofollow">http://openid.net/foundation/intellectual-property/</a> seems to have disappeared. Is it correct to assume <a href="http://openid.net/ipr/archive/OpenID_IPR_Rationale-Circulation_Draft_20070925.pdf" rel="nofollow">Draft_20070925.pdf</a> is still the latest and that it will be updated?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d really like to figure out why W3C, IETF, OASIS, etc. IPR policies and processes were not considered usable. Perhaps a rationale FAQ entry could describe the reasoning and what diffs there are to these other standard orgs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Property Articles &#187; Blog Archive &#187; OpenID Intellectual Property Policy Approved</title>
		<link>http://openid.net/2007/12/31/openid-intellectual-property-policy-approved/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Property Articles &#187; Blog Archive &#187; OpenID Intellectual Property Policy Approved</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 10:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openid.net/2008/01/01/openid-intellectual-property-policy-approved/#comment-310</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by Scott Kveton [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by Scott Kveton [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Good Year for OpenID? at Not So Relevant</title>
		<link>http://openid.net/2007/12/31/openid-intellectual-property-policy-approved/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>A Good Year for OpenID? at Not So Relevant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 10:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openid.net/2008/01/01/openid-intellectual-property-policy-approved/#comment-309</guid>
		<description>[...] aspects as well. OpenID 2.0 and OpenID Attribute Exchange are final; the IPR policy (Update Jan 1: the policy is final as well. Great!) and the Provider Authentication Policy Extension are close to be final as well. Also [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] aspects as well. OpenID 2.0 and OpenID Attribute Exchange are final; the IPR policy (Update Jan 1: the policy is final as well. Great!) and the Provider Authentication Policy Extension are close to be final as well. Also [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inmateabout.Com &#187; OpenID Intellectual Property Policy Approved</title>
		<link>http://openid.net/2007/12/31/openid-intellectual-property-policy-approved/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Inmateabout.Com &#187; OpenID Intellectual Property Policy Approved</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 08:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openid.net/2008/01/01/openid-intellectual-property-policy-approved/#comment-308</guid>
		<description>[...] an interesting post today on OpenID Intellectual Property Policy ApprovedHere&#8217;s a quick [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an interesting post today on OpenID Intellectual Property Policy ApprovedHere&#8217;s a quick [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Jones: self-issued &#187; New Years Gift: OpenID Intellectual Property Policy Approved</title>
		<link>http://openid.net/2007/12/31/openid-intellectual-property-policy-approved/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jones: self-issued &#187; New Years Gift: OpenID Intellectual Property Policy Approved</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 03:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openid.net/2008/01/01/openid-intellectual-property-policy-approved/#comment-306</guid>
		<description>[...] Scott Kveton just posted, earlier this month the OpenID Foundation board approved OpenID Intellectual Property Policy and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scott Kveton just posted, earlier this month the OpenID Foundation board approved OpenID Intellectual Property Policy and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Messina</title>
		<link>http://openid.net/2007/12/31/openid-intellectual-property-policy-approved/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Messina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openid.net/2008/01/01/openid-intellectual-property-policy-approved/#comment-301</guid>
		<description>Whohoo! Let the party begin!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whohoo! Let the party begin!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
